Based on the common law or court decisions, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), and regulations of the Medicare Program governing discharge planning in hospitals, patients clearly have the right to freedom of choice of providers. Both providers and patients seem to agree that this right is important to patients.
This right has, however, generated considerable conflict between referring providers and recipients of referrals. Recipients and potential recipients of referrals express continued doubt that referring providers honor patients’ right to freedom of choice. Referring providers often say that they scrupulously abide by requirements related to this right.
The real problem, however, seems to be that patients’ often cannot choose. Perhaps it’s that they lack enough knowledge to make choices. It may be that they are in pain or too ill to participate in making choices. It may be something else entirely. Now we have a recent study that makes it clear that this is indeed the case.
The study was recently published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Simon N. Elkind et al, Influences on Care Preferences of Older People with Advanced Illness: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018). The authors of the study reviewed 57 studies about preferences of older adults. Preferences included where people wanted to be cared for, the kinds of communications and decision-making they wanted, and the quality of life they expected to have over time.
Key findings of the study were as follows:
Researchers concluded that providers should take these influences into account when considering patients’ preferences. They should also make sure that family members or other caregivers who are important to patients are included in discussions about future care.
So, it seems clear that the difficulties patients have in making choices about future care are significant. Conditions of participation (CoPs) of the Medicare Program for hospitals and standards of care published by the Case Management Society of A